PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 18.56%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.26% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
1.24%
1M
-1.60%
6M
9.04%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
18.56%
ALL TIME*
13.31%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$31.37M$30.53M$39.00M

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
10.15%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and ^GSPC is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.91

The correlation between ONEQ and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQ^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.00

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

8.49

-2.80

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQ^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-56.78%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-9.10%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-18.90%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-25.43%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-33.92%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-1.58%

-4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-10.70%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.14%

+1.63%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQ^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

3.51%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

10.11%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

12.87%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.47%

17.01%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.82%

18.07%

+3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ONEQ and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer