PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.


VTWV

1D
1.31%
1M
2.63%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.10%
1Y
43.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.34%

VYM

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.60%
YTD
12.42%
6M
11.92%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
18.98%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.42%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VYM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.79

The correlation between VTWV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
VYM

Financial Services

23.9%
20.5%

Industrials

11.9%
12.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
0.0%

Healthcare

10.2%
12.2%

Technology

10.0%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
6.7%

Energy

8.9%
9.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
3.5%

Utilities

5.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
8.1%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
VYM
12.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
VYM
0.0%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
VYM
12.2%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
VYM
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
VYM
6.7%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
VYM
9.8%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
VYM
3.5%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
VYM
5.7%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
VYM
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

3.99

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

15.01

+2.41

VTWV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.61

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.83

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.73

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-56.98%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-6.69%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-14.46%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-15.84%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-35.21%

-10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.48%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-7.19%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.78%

+0.75%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.72%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

2.72%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

7.66%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

10.26%

+7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

13.96%

+7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

16.34%

+7.20%

VTWV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.56%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWV and VYM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VYM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.84% vs 10.34% for VTWV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer