VTWV vs. VYM
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.34%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for VYM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VTWV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
VTWV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.98% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.42% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and VYM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VTWV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
VYM
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
VYM
Industrials
VTWV
VYM
Real Estate
VTWV
VYM
Healthcare
VTWV
VYM
Technology
VTWV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
VYM
Energy
VTWV
VYM
Basic Materials
VTWV
VYM
Utilities
VTWV
VYM
Communication Services
VTWV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
VYM
VTWV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.99 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 15.01 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.61 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.83 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.73 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -56.98% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -6.69% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -14.46% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -15.84% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -35.21% | -10.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.48% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -7.19% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.78% | +0.75% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.72%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.72% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 7.66% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 10.26% | +7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 13.96% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 16.34% | +7.20% |
VTWV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and VYM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VYM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.84% vs 10.34% for VTWV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer