PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VTWV vs. IWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VTWV vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.34%/yr vs 10.19%/yr for IWN. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

VTWV vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWV having a 18.98% return and IWN slightly higher at 19.00%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWV having a 10.34% annualized return and IWN not far behind at 10.19%.

VTWV

1D
1.31%
1M
2.63%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.10%
1Y
43.90%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.34%

IWN

1D
1.34%
1M
2.59%
YTD
19.00%
6M
17.88%
1Y
43.68%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF		18.98%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF		19.00%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and IWN is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VTWV and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VTWV
IWN

Financial Services

23.9%
24.2%

Industrials

11.9%
11.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.8%

Technology

10.0%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.7%

Energy

8.9%
9.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%
5.4%

Utilities

5.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
2.0%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
IWN
24.2%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
IWN
11.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
IWN
10.2%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
IWN
8.8%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
IWN
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
IWN
8.7%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
IWN
9.2%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
IWN
5.4%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
IWN
5.7%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
IWN
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
IWN
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

Often compared with VTWV:
VTWV vs. VTWOVTWV vs. VBRVTWV vs. VTWGVTWV vs. VIOVVTWV vs. VONGVTWV vs. VBVTWV vs. VTC
Often compared with IWN:
IWN vs. IWMIWN vs. IWOIWN vs. VTWOIWN vs. IJSIWN vs. IWSIWN vs. IWVIWN vs. IWX

Return for Risk

VTWV vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VTWVIWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
2.47

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.39
3.44

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

5.19

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

17.45

-0.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTWV vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VTWVIWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.32

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.44

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.39

+0.10

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and IWN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VTWVIWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-61.55%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.45%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-26.70%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-26.70%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-46.08%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.15%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-10.15%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.51%

+0.02%

Volatility

VTWV vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) have volatilities of 5.00% and 4.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VTWVIWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.88%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

11.91%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

17.79%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.44%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

23.39%

+0.15%

VTWV vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTWV vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than IWN's 1.44% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF		1.44%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF		1.56%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, VTWV and IWN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to IWN (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs IWN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.34% vs 10.19% for IWN. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.34% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.44% for IWN.

Both ETFs track Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.24% for IWN.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and IWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer