IWN vs. IWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO).
IWN and IWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. IWO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both IWN and IWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWN or IWO.
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and IWO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWN vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWN:
0.46
IWO:
0.84
IWN:
0.81
IWO:
1.29
IWN:
1.10
IWO:
1.15
IWN:
0.72
IWO:
0.66
IWN:
2.34
IWO:
4.38
IWN:
4.17%
IWO:
4.15%
IWN:
21.01%
IWO:
21.61%
IWN:
-61.55%
IWO:
-60.10%
IWN:
-9.23%
IWO:
-11.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed IWO with an annualized return of 7.08%, while IWO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.
IWN
7.39%
-4.71%
10.36%
7.52%
7.03%
7.08%
IWO
15.51%
-1.49%
11.25%
16.08%
6.84%
8.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWN vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWN and IWO have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWN vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWN vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than IWO's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 2.35% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.88% | 1.77% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 1.00% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
IWN vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWN vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 5.95%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.