IWN vs. IWV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV).
IWN and IWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. IWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IWN and IWV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWN or IWV.
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and IWV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWN vs. IWV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWN:
-0.04
IWV:
0.60
IWN:
0.08
IWV:
0.89
IWN:
1.01
IWV:
1.12
IWN:
-0.05
IWV:
0.82
IWN:
-0.13
IWV:
2.70
IWN:
6.65%
IWV:
3.19%
IWN:
20.11%
IWV:
14.25%
IWN:
-61.55%
IWV:
-55.61%
IWN:
-14.97%
IWV:
-7.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a -6.54% return, which is significantly lower than IWV's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed IWV with an annualized return of 5.99%, while IWV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.
IWN
-6.54%
-2.72%
-5.90%
0.82%
17.78%
5.99%
IWV
-3.66%
-3.01%
-0.26%
9.44%
19.39%
11.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWN vs. IWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IWV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWN vs. IWV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWN
IWV
IWN vs. IWV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWN vs. IWV - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than IWV's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.89% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.88% |
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
IWN vs. IWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than IWV's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWN vs. IWV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.