IWN vs. IWS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.

Performance

IWN vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than IWS's 19.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWN having a 10.28% annualized return and IWS not far ahead at 10.30%.

IWN

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.04%
• 6M: 14.84%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 1Y: 43.20%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: 10.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.49%

IWS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 14.40%
• YTD: 19.19%
• 1Y: 27.66%
• 3Y*: 15.33%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 10.30%
• ALL TIME*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	$142.85M	$119.46M	$143.70M
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	$90.38M	$82.14M	$73.71M

IWN vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	22.87%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	19.19%	10.82%	12.91%	12.52%	-12.29%	28.10%	4.83%	26.73%	-12.43%	13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and IWS is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001	0.91

The correlation between IWN and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWN vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWN	IWS
Financial Services	28.1%	16.3%
Industrials	12.1%	14.9%
Real Estate	11.4%	8.7%
Healthcare	10.5%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	8.5%
Technology	6.8%	13.3%
Energy	6.0%	7.1%
Utilities	5.2%	7.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	5.7%
Communication Services	2.2%	2.4%

Return for Risk

IWN vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 92
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

IWS

IWS Risk / Return Rank: 85
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWN vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWN	IWS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.94	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	2.81	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	3.47	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.22	13.35	+3.86

IWN vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWN vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWN	IWS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-62.40%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-7.53%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-20.57%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	-21.23%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.08%	-43.83%	-2.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-1.38%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-7.97%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.95%	+0.40%

Volatility

IWN vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 2.96%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWN	IWS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	2.96%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	9.98%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	13.46%	+3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.22%	17.26%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	19.30%	+4.03%

IWN vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWN vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than IWS's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.44%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.30%	1.53%	1.50%	1.76%	1.93%	1.39%	1.87%	1.97%	2.53%	1.96%	2.10%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWN and IWS in my portfolio?

IWN and IWS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWN or IWS?

IWN has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to IWS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs IWS's -62.40%.

Which ETF is better, IWN or IWS?

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.30% vs 10.28% for IWN. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWN or IWS?

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWN or IWS?

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWN or IWS?

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.30% for IWS.

What is the main difference between IWN and IWS?

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.23% for IWS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.