IWN vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.74%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for IWM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IWN vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWN having a 21.06% return and IWM slightly higher at 21.64%. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 10.74%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.

IWN

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.53%
• YTD: 21.06%
• 6M: 18.12%
• 1Y: 44.70%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 7.50%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

IWM

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 21.64%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 44.01%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	21.06%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	21.64%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and IWM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000	0.96

The correlation between IWN and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWN vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWN	IWM
Financial Services	23.9%	15.5%
Industrials	12.1%	17.3%
Technology	11.6%	20.1%
Real Estate	10.2%	5.5%
Healthcare	10.1%	15.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	8.0%
Energy	7.9%	6.0%
Basic Materials	5.4%	4.5%
Utilities	5.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	2.7%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	2.0%

Return for Risk

IWN vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 83
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 87

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 72
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWN	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.24	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.05	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.31	4.01	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.88	14.19	+3.69

IWN vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWN vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWN	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-59.05%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-11.03%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-27.50%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	-31.91%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.08%	-41.13%	-4.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-10.75%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	3.11%	-0.60%

Volatility

IWN vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 5.29%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWN	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	6.47%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	14.28%	-1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.08%	19.75%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.41%	22.60%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.42%	23.09%	+0.33%

IWN vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWN vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than IWM's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.89%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.46%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWN and IWM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, IWN and IWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWN or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to IWN (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IWN or IWM?

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 11.68% vs 10.74% for IWN. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWN or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWN or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWN or IWM?

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.89% for IWM.

What is the main difference between IWN and IWM?

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.