IWN vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
IWN and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IWN and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWN or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and IWM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWN vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWN:
0.81
IWM:
0.98
IWN:
1.26
IWM:
1.48
IWN:
1.16
IWM:
1.18
IWN:
1.26
IWM:
1.08
IWN:
3.84
IWM:
4.88
IWN:
4.36%
IWM:
4.18%
IWN:
20.73%
IWM:
20.71%
IWN:
-61.55%
IWM:
-59.05%
IWN:
-7.49%
IWM:
-6.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 7.54%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
IWN
1.69%
2.62%
2.36%
14.59%
7.37%
7.54%
IWM
2.04%
2.55%
4.64%
18.54%
7.32%
8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWN vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWN vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWN
IWM
IWN vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWN vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than IWM's 1.12% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.88% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
IWN vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWN vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 6.45% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.