VTWO vs. VYM
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWO returned 11.12%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VTWO vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 11.12%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
VTWO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
VTWO vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 18.87% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.42% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and VYM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VTWO and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWO vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
VYM
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
VTWO
VYM
Technology
VTWO
VYM
Healthcare
VTWO
VYM
Financial Services
VTWO
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
VYM
Real Estate
VTWO
VYM
Energy
VTWO
VYM
Basic Materials
VTWO
VYM
Utilities
VTWO
VYM
Communication Services
VTWO
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
VYM
VTWO vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.99 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 15.01 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.61 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -56.98% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -6.69% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -14.46% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -15.84% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -35.21% | -5.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -7.19% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.78% | +1.30% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.72%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 2.72% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 7.66% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 10.26% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 13.96% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 16.34% | +6.74% |
VTWO vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWO vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWO and VYM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to VYM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.84% vs 11.12% for VTWO. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTWO.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.07% for VTWO.
VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer