VTWO vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
VTWO and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both VTWO and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTWO or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and IWM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VTWO vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VTWO:
0.67
IWM:
0.66
VTWO:
1.07
IWM:
1.05
VTWO:
1.13
IWM:
1.13
VTWO:
0.74
IWM:
0.71
VTWO:
3.62
IWM:
3.54
VTWO:
3.88%
IWM:
3.90%
VTWO:
20.95%
IWM:
21.00%
VTWO:
-41.19%
IWM:
-59.05%
VTWO:
-8.60%
IWM:
-8.62%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWO having a 11.51% return and IWM slightly lower at 11.32%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 7.96% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 7.87%.
VTWO
11.51%
-3.25%
10.83%
11.80%
7.47%
7.96%
IWM
11.32%
-3.25%
10.71%
11.61%
7.28%
7.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWO vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTWO vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VTWO vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than IWM's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 0.84% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.48% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VTWO vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 6.13% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.