VTWO vs. FSSNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX).
VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. FSSNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 0.92% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | -2.46% | 12.94% | 11.71% | 17.11% | -20.28% | 14.70% | 19.99% | 25.70% | -11.24% | 14.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than FSSNX's -2.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 9.90% annualized return and FSSNX not far behind at 9.53%.
VTWO
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
FSSNX
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
FSSNX
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.41 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.34 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 5.05 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.14 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and FSSNX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than FSSNX's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.04% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 3.92% | 0.94% | 2.96% | 4.94% | 3.37% | 2.27% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum FSSNX drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and FSSNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -41.72% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -13.89% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -31.87% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -41.72% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -11.00% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -8.37% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.68% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) at 6.60%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 6.60% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 14.12% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 23.11% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 22.56% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 23.38% | -0.34% |