PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWO having a 20.23% return and VTWV slightly higher at 20.69%. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has outperformed VTWV with an annualized return of 11.54%, while VTWV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


VTWO

1D
0.81%
1M
6.35%
YTD
20.23%
6M
17.96%
1Y
43.20%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
11.54%

VTWV

1D
-0.06%
1M
6.01%
YTD
20.69%
6M
17.89%
1Y
45.09%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
20.23%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
20.69%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and VTWV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VTWO and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
VTWV

Industrials

17.7%
11.9%

Technology

17.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

16.5%
10.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

6.1%
10.4%

Energy

6.1%
8.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
5.4%

Utilities

2.9%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.2%

Industrials

VTWO
17.7%
VTWV
11.9%

Technology

VTWO
17.0%
VTWV
10.0%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.5%
VTWV
10.2%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.7%
VTWV
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
8.4%
VTWV
9.2%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.1%
VTWV
10.4%

Energy

VTWO
6.1%
VTWV
8.9%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.8%
VTWV
5.4%

Utilities

VTWO
2.9%
VTWV
5.2%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.4%
VTWV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.4%
VTWV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWOVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

5.24

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

17.93

-3.93

VTWO vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-45.73%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.64%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-26.72%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-26.72%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-45.73%

+4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-7.80%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.52%

+0.57%

Volatility

VTWO vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) at 5.93%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

5.93%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

12.53%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

18.40%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

21.77%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

23.56%

-0.42%

VTWO vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWO vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than VTWV's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.05%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.54%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTWO and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to VTWV (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.54% vs 10.72% for VTWV. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.05% for VTWO.

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTWV is Small Cap Value Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer