PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. VTWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWO having a 21.09% return and VTWG slightly lower at 20.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 11.78% annualized return and VTWG not far ahead at 12.14%.


VTWO

1D
0.46%
1M
4.33%
YTD
21.09%
6M
17.98%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
11.78%

VTWG

1D
0.21%
1M
4.58%
YTD
20.68%
6M
16.99%
1Y
38.16%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
21.09%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.68%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and VTWG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VTWO and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. VTWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
VTWG

Technology

19.1%
25.8%

Industrials

17.9%
23.1%

Healthcare

16.3%
22.0%

Financial Services

15.5%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.1%

Real Estate

5.9%
2.0%

Energy

5.3%
3.1%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.0%

Utilities

2.8%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
2.3%

Technology

VTWO
19.1%
VTWG
25.8%

Industrials

VTWO
17.9%
VTWG
23.1%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.3%
VTWG
22.0%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.5%
VTWG
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
7.9%
VTWG
7.1%

Real Estate

VTWO
5.9%
VTWG
2.0%

Energy

VTWO
5.3%
VTWG
3.1%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.7%
VTWG
4.0%

Utilities

VTWO
2.8%
VTWG
0.6%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.5%
VTWG
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.2%
VTWG
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWOVTWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.58

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

9.25

+3.75

VTWO vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWG drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VTWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOVTWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-42.07%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-14.88%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-28.58%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-40.49%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-42.07%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.25%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-10.50%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.14%

-1.04%

Volatility

VTWO vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) is 6.53%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that VTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOVTWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.76%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

16.86%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

22.32%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

24.67%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

24.27%

-1.16%

VTWO vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTWO and VTWG have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWO vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.09%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VTWO and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to VTWO (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.14% vs 11.78% for VTWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, VTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO and VTWG have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTWG is Small Cap Growth Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and VTWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer