PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VTWO vs. VTWG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and VTWG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

VTWO vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.09%
5.12%
VTWO
VTWG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VTWO:

1.00

VTWG:

1.13

Sortino Ratio

VTWO:

1.49

VTWG:

1.65

Omega Ratio

VTWO:

1.18

VTWG:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

VTWO:

1.11

VTWG:

0.89

Martin Ratio

VTWO:

4.94

VTWG:

5.49

Ulcer Index

VTWO:

4.17%

VTWG:

4.40%

Daily Std Dev

VTWO:

20.65%

VTWG:

21.36%

Max Drawdown

VTWO:

-41.19%

VTWG:

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

VTWO:

-6.70%

VTWG:

-9.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than VTWG's 2.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 8.41% annualized return and VTWG not far ahead at 8.64%.


VTWO

YTD

2.04%

1M

2.07%

6M

4.73%

1Y

19.88%

5Y*

7.51%

10Y*

8.41%

VTWG

YTD

2.43%

1M

2.25%

6M

7.02%

1Y

23.57%

5Y*

6.67%

10Y*

8.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VTWO vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for VTWG: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VTWO: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VTWO vs. VTWG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTWO is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTWO is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTWO is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTWO is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTWO is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTWO is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTWG is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTWG is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTWG is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTWG is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTWG is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTWG is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VTWO vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VTWO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.001.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for VTWO, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.491.65
The chart of Omega ratio for VTWO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.181.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for VTWO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.110.89
The chart of Martin ratio for VTWO, currently valued at 4.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.945.49
VTWO
VTWG

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and VTWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.00
1.13
VTWO
VTWG

Dividends

VTWO vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than VTWG's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.19%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%1.12%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.54%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%0.62%

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWG drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VTWG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.70%
-9.88%
VTWO
VTWG

Volatility

VTWO vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.52%
6.76%
VTWO
VTWG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab