VTWO vs. VTTVX
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and VTTVX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund) are both funds - VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while VTTVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VTWO returned 11.07%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for VTTVX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTTVX.
Performance
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than VTTVX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has outperformed VTTVX with an annualized return of 11.07%, while VTTVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
VTTVX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
VTTVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund | 6.82% | 14.63% | 9.23% | 14.76% | -15.57% | 9.78% | 13.31% | 19.63% | -5.14% | 13.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and VTTVX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VTWO and VTTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
VTTVX
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
VTWO
VTTVX
Technology
VTWO
VTTVX
Healthcare
VTWO
VTTVX
Financial Services
VTWO
VTTVX
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
VTTVX
Real Estate
VTWO
VTTVX
Energy
VTWO
VTTVX
Basic Materials
VTWO
VTTVX
Utilities
VTWO
VTTVX
Communication Services
VTWO
VTTVX
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
VTTVX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. VTTVX — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
VTTVX
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund (VTTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | VTTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.09 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 13.50 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | VTTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.52 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.68 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum VTTVX drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VTTVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | VTTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -46.03% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -5.57% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -7.84% | -19.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -21.52% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -22.51% | -18.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | 0.00% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -5.05% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.27% | +1.81% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund (VTTVX) at 2.24%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | VTTVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 2.24% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 5.53% | +7.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 6.83% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 9.09% | +13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 9.94% | +13.14% |
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VTTVX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWO vs. VTTVX - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VTTVX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTTVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund | 6.91% | 7.38% | 7.63% | 3.96% | 2.96% | 16.28% | 4.35% | 2.57% | 3.14% | 0.47% | 2.68% | 4.98% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWO and VTTVX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to VTTVX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VTTVX's -46.03%.
VTTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and VTTVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer