PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.


VTWO

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.51%
YTD
17.08%
6M
15.89%
1Y
39.34%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
11.07%

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
17.08%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and OUSM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.88

The correlation between VTWO and OUSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTWO vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
OUSM

Industrials

17.7%
22.8%

Technology

17.0%
13.5%

Healthcare

16.5%
9.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
19.3%

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Energy

6.1%
0.3%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.4%

Utilities

2.9%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Industrials

VTWO
17.7%
OUSM
22.8%

Technology

VTWO
17.0%
OUSM
13.5%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.5%
OUSM
9.2%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.7%
OUSM
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
8.4%
OUSM
19.3%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.1%
OUSM

-

Energy

VTWO
6.1%
OUSM
0.3%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.8%
OUSM
1.4%

Utilities

VTWO
2.9%
OUSM
3.9%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.4%
OUSM
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.4%
OUSM
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWOOUSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.19

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

3.47

+9.31

VTWO vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWOOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.83

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.48

+0.05

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-39.84%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-9.21%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-19.44%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-19.44%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.67%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-5.22%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.14%

-0.06%

Volatility

VTWO vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

3.66%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

9.25%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

13.15%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

16.30%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

18.94%

+4.14%

VTWO vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWO vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.08%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWO and OUSM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 6.28% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.

VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.48% for OUSM.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer