PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.


OUSM

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.93%
6M
8.31%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
16.09%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.37%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.75M$3.66M$3.05M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

OUSM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
12.35%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2016

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSM and VOO has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSM
VOO

Industrials

24.2%
8.5%

Financial Services

21.7%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

21.0%
9.5%

Technology

11.4%
38.6%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.5%

Utilities

4.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
9.9%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.7%

Energy

0.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Industrials

OUSM
24.2%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

OUSM
21.7%
VOO
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSM
21.0%
VOO
9.5%

Technology

OUSM
11.4%
VOO
38.6%

Healthcare

OUSM
8.0%
VOO
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

OUSM
4.3%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

OUSM
4.1%
VOO
2.2%

Communication Services

OUSM
3.5%
VOO
9.9%

Basic Materials

OUSM
1.5%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

OUSM
0.3%
VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

OUSM

-

VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OUSM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.21

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

9.44

-4.82

OUSM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-33.99%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.90%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-18.69%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-24.52%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.38%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.67%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.08%

+1.03%

Volatility

OUSM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that OUSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.54%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

10.10%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

12.82%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.93%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

18.01%

+0.84%

OUSM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
1.93%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 8.29% for OUSM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

OUSM is categorized as Quality Factor, while VOO is S&P 500. OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer