PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 18.01% return.


OUSM

1D
0.65%
1M
0.72%
YTD
6.87%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*

DIVB

1D
1.00%
1M
8.21%
YTD
18.01%
6M
20.03%
1Y
31.43%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.87%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%3.66%
DIVB
iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF
18.01%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and DIVB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.86

The correlation between OUSM and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSMDIVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

2.79

-1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

3.92

-2.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.49

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

4.67

-3.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.68

15.96

-12.27

OUSM vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSMDIVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.79

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.82

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.76

-0.29

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-36.93%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-6.82%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-15.45%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-21.08%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-5.00%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.00%

+1.14%

Volatility

OUSM vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF (DIVB) at 3.44%. This indicates that OUSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.44%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

8.43%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

11.32%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.23%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.38%

+0.56%

OUSM vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than DIVB's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVB
iShares U.S. Dividend and Buyback ETF
2.17%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and DIVB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to DIVB (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.47% vs 7.50% for OUSM. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DIVB has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 2.07% for OUSM.

OUSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DIVB is Large Cap Blend Equities. OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.25% for DIVB.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer