PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. FTHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly lower than FTHNX's 12.71% return.


OUSM

1D
0.02%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.33%
6M
6.41%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

FTHNX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.22%
YTD
12.71%
6M
10.62%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
8.33%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
12.71%11.69%15.81%22.18%-7.73%30.44%10.05%27.74%-13.45%17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and FTHNX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2016

0.92

The correlation between OUSM and FTHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHNX
FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSMFTHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.21

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

11.44

-7.05

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FTHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and FTHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and FTHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMFTHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-37.78%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.44%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-24.63%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-24.63%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.74%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-5.68%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.64%

+0.51%

Volatility

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.30%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMFTHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.05%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

10.98%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

15.38%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.91%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

20.13%

-1.22%

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than FTHNX's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
0.25%0.28%7.84%1.60%0.95%3.55%0.11%0.11%0.21%0.09%0.00%15.47%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.03%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and FTHNX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHNX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to OUSM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs FTHNX's -37.78%.

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and FTHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer