OUSM vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
OUSM and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OUSM is a passively managed fund by O'Shares Investments that tracks the performance of the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 30, 2016. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both OUSM and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OUSM or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and SCHG is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
OUSM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OUSM:
1.01
SCHG:
2.30
OUSM:
1.52
SCHG:
2.95
OUSM:
1.18
SCHG:
1.41
OUSM:
2.05
SCHG:
3.25
OUSM:
5.52
SCHG:
12.77
OUSM:
2.64%
SCHG:
3.14%
OUSM:
14.43%
SCHG:
17.47%
OUSM:
-39.84%
SCHG:
-34.59%
OUSM:
-6.09%
SCHG:
-0.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 40.14% return.
OUSM
14.65%
-4.55%
8.71%
14.56%
10.42%
N/A
SCHG
40.14%
5.39%
15.20%
40.13%
20.58%
16.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OUSM vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OUSM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OUSM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 1.61% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.62% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OUSM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 4.12%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.