PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHR vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHR vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHR has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 14.95%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


VTHR

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.88%
YTD
10.94%
6M
10.83%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
14.95%

VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
10.94%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%20.93%30.82%-5.65%21.06%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and VO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.90

The correlation between VTHR and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTHR vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHR
VO

Technology

33.1%
18.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.6%

Industrials

9.6%
17.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

3.8%
8.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
5.4%

Utilities

2.3%
8.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.2%

Technology

VTHR
33.1%
VO
18.6%

Financial Services

VTHR
12.1%
VO
12.8%

Communication Services

VTHR
10.5%
VO
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHR
10.2%
VO
8.6%

Industrials

VTHR
9.6%
VO
17.9%

Healthcare

VTHR
9.1%
VO
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

VTHR
4.7%
VO
4.8%

Energy

VTHR
3.8%
VO
8.5%

Real Estate

VTHR
2.4%
VO
5.4%

Utilities

VTHR
2.3%
VO
8.3%

Basic Materials

VTHR
2.2%
VO
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHR vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.23

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

8.50

+5.85

VTHR vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.48

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.45

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.61

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.50

+0.35

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-58.87%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.17%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-19.02%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-27.57%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

-39.37%

+4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.45%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-7.86%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.14%

-0.20%

Volatility

VTHR vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.99%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

9.21%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

12.34%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.59%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

18.95%

-1.11%

VTHR vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHR vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.00%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTHR and VO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VTHR (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VTHR leads with 14.95% vs 11.55% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VTHR.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.00% for VTHR.

VTHR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTHR and 0.03% for VO.

VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHR and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer