VTHR vs. VONG
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTHR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTHR returned 15.06%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
VTHR vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHR has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.06%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.
VTHR
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
VONG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
VTHR vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 8.70% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 1.56% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and VONG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VTHR and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHR vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHR
VONG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTHR
VONG
Financial Services
VTHR
VONG
Communication Services
VTHR
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
VTHR
VONG
Industrials
VTHR
VONG
Healthcare
VTHR
VONG
Consumer Defensive
VTHR
VONG
Energy
VTHR
VONG
Real Estate
VTHR
VONG
Utilities
VTHR
VONG
Basic Materials
VTHR
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
VONG
VTHR vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTHR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.12 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.99 | 3.64 | +8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -32.72% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -16.23% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -23.27% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -32.72% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | -32.72% | -1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -6.82% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -4.88% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 4.97% | -2.97% |
Volatility
VTHR vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) is 4.78%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that VTHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 6.04% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 12.59% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 16.17% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 21.45% | -4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 20.92% | -3.06% |
VTHR vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTHR and VONG have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTHR vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VTHR and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to VTHR (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.39% vs 15.06% for VTHR. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, VTHR has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 15.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR and VONG have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.
VTHR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index.
VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer