VTHR vs. VONE
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Vanguard - VTHR tracks the Russell 3000 Index while VONE tracks the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTHR returned 15.22%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for VONE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.
Performance
VTHR vs. VONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 9.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTHR having a 15.22% annualized return and VONE not far ahead at 15.46%.
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
VONE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
VTHR vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.18% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 9.48% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 20.95% | 31.12% | -4.84% | 21.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and VONE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VTHR and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHR vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHR
VONE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTHR
VONE
Financial Services
VTHR
VONE
Communication Services
VTHR
VONE
Consumer Cyclical
VTHR
VONE
Industrials
VTHR
VONE
Healthcare
VTHR
VONE
Consumer Defensive
VTHR
VONE
Energy
VTHR
VONE
Real Estate
VTHR
VONE
Utilities
VTHR
VONE
Basic Materials
VTHR
VONE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
VONE
VTHR vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTHR | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.94 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 13.14 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VONE drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -34.66% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.85% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -19.06% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -25.12% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | -34.66% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.67% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.90% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.98% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VTHR vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 9.76% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 12.52% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 17.16% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 18.29% | -0.40% |
VTHR vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTHR vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches VONE's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VTHR and VONE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTHR has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to VONE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VONE's -34.66%.
On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 15.22% for VTHR. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VONE.
VTHR and VONE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.03%.
VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.08% for VONE.
VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and VONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer