VTHR vs. VTI
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Vanguard - VTHR tracks the Russell 3000 Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTHR returned 15.22%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
VTHR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTHR having a 10.18% return and VTI slightly higher at 10.35%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTHR having a 15.22% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.31%.
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
VTHR vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.18% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.35% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and VTI is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VTHR and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHR vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHR
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTHR
VTI
Financial Services
VTHR
VTI
Communication Services
VTHR
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
VTHR
VTI
Industrials
VTHR
VTI
Healthcare
VTHR
VTI
Consumer Defensive
VTHR
VTI
Energy
VTHR
VTI
Real Estate
VTHR
VTI
Utilities
VTHR
VTI
Basic Materials
VTHR
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
VTI
VTHR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTHR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 3.06 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 13.68 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -55.45% | +20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.92% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -19.30% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -25.36% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | -35.00% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.48% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -8.01% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.99% | 0.00% |
Volatility
VTHR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.74% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 9.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 12.76% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 17.49% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 18.35% | -0.46% |
VTHR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTHR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches VTI's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VTHR and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to VTHR (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 15.22% for VTHR. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTHR has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTHR.
VTHR and VTI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.03%.
VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer