VSMV vs. MGV
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV).
VSMV and MGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VSMV is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2017. MGV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Value Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both VSMV and MGV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VSMV or MGV.
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and MGV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VSMV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VSMV:
1.82
MGV:
1.67
VSMV:
2.52
MGV:
2.37
VSMV:
1.34
MGV:
1.30
VSMV:
3.21
MGV:
2.53
VSMV:
10.58
MGV:
9.98
VSMV:
1.56%
MGV:
1.71%
VSMV:
9.04%
MGV:
10.22%
VSMV:
-31.33%
MGV:
-56.31%
VSMV:
-4.56%
MGV:
-6.74%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VSMV having a 16.14% return and MGV slightly lower at 15.87%.
VSMV
16.14%
-1.58%
6.94%
15.95%
9.77%
N/A
MGV
15.87%
-4.34%
5.25%
16.31%
10.08%
10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSMV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VSMV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VSMV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than MGV's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 2.35% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VSMV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is 2.80%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that VSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.