PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSMV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 13.05% return.


VSMV

1D
0.36%
1M
1.84%
YTD
8.93%
6M
10.25%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*

MGV

1D
0.89%
1M
4.32%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.92%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
8.93%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
13.05%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%11.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and MGV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.80

The correlation between VSMV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSMV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSMV
MGV

Technology

34.4%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.6%
11.9%

Healthcare

14.8%
16.6%

Industrials

8.5%
13.7%

Financial Services

8.1%
23.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
3.7%

Energy

4.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.2%

Utilities

0.0%
2.6%

Technology

VSMV
34.4%
MGV
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

VSMV
17.6%
MGV
11.9%

Healthcare

VSMV
14.8%
MGV
16.6%

Industrials

VSMV
8.5%
MGV
13.7%

Financial Services

VSMV
8.1%
MGV
23.9%

Communication Services

VSMV
5.4%
MGV
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VSMV
5.0%
MGV
3.7%

Energy

VSMV
4.4%
MGV
6.6%

Basic Materials

VSMV
1.8%
MGV
2.4%

Real Estate

VSMV
0.0%
MGV
1.2%

Utilities

VSMV
0.0%
MGV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSMVMGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.80

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

3.99

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.30

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.11

16.33

+1.78

VSMV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSMVMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.89

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.48

+0.34

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-55.87%

+24.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-6.42%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-13.18%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-16.54%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

0.00%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-7.70%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.68%

-0.32%

Volatility

VSMV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) have volatilities of 2.50% and 2.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSMVMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.61%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

7.50%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

9.83%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

13.56%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

16.34%

-1.29%

VSMV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSMV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MGV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.89%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.32%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSMV and MGV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGV has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to VSMV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs MGV's -55.87%.

On 5-year performance, MGV leads with 11.99% vs 11.42% for VSMV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGV has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.32% for VSMV.

VSMV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSMV and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer