VSMV vs. ROUS
VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSMV returned 11.19%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for ROUS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSMV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
VSMV vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 15.33% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 27.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
VSMV vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.57% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 15.33% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and ROUS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VSMV and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSMV vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSMV
ROUS
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VSMV
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
VSMV
ROUS
Healthcare
VSMV
ROUS
Industrials
VSMV
ROUS
Financial Services
VSMV
ROUS
Communication Services
VSMV
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
VSMV
ROUS
Energy
VSMV
ROUS
Basic Materials
VSMV
ROUS
Real Estate
VSMV
ROUS
Utilities
VSMV
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
ROUS
VSMV vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSMV | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 4.63 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 18.66 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -35.51% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -5.97% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -15.81% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -18.91% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -1.91% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -4.22% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.48% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is 3.31%, while Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that VSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 4.01% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 8.96% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 11.70% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.88% | 14.43% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.99% | -1.97% |
VSMV vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSMV vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than ROUS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSMV and ROUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROUS has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VSMV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.64% vs 11.19% for VSMV. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.34% for ROUS.
VSMV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while ROUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.19% for ROUS.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSMV and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer