PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSMV vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.47% return.


VSMV

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.25%
6M
5.49%
YTD
8.83%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%

ROUS

1D
0.35%
1M
0.39%
6M
12.32%
YTD
16.47%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
12.74%
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.37M$3.67M$3.26M
$373.65K$273.95K$267.92K

VSMV vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
8.83%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.47%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and ROUS is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.82

The correlation between VSMV and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSMV vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSMV
ROUS

Technology

38.1%
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

16.0%
5.4%

Healthcare

15.0%
11.1%

Industrials

8.2%
10.4%

Financial Services

7.8%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
9.1%

Communication Services

4.6%
6.3%

Energy

3.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.2%

Utilities

0.0%
3.7%

Technology

VSMV
38.1%
ROUS
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

VSMV
16.0%
ROUS
5.4%

Healthcare

VSMV
15.0%
ROUS
11.1%

Industrials

VSMV
8.2%
ROUS
10.4%

Financial Services

VSMV
7.8%
ROUS
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VSMV
4.9%
ROUS
9.1%

Communication Services

VSMV
4.6%
ROUS
6.3%

Energy

VSMV
3.9%
ROUS
2.7%

Basic Materials

VSMV
1.6%
ROUS
2.1%

Real Estate

VSMV
0.0%
ROUS
2.2%

Utilities

VSMV
0.0%
ROUS
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSMV vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSMVROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

4.31

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

17.07

-1.03

VSMV vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-35.51%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-5.97%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-15.81%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-18.91%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-0.94%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-4.20%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.51%

-0.07%

Volatility

VSMV vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.46%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSMVROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.46%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

8.78%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

11.64%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

14.42%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

16.91%

-1.93%

VSMV vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSMV vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, which matches ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.32%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSMV and ROUS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSMV has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to ROUS (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.19% vs 10.59% for VSMV. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV and ROUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.32%.

VSMV is categorized as Multi-factor, while ROUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.19% for ROUS.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSMV and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer