PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSMV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 2.78% return.


VSMV

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.18%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*

LGLV

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
2.78%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMV vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
7.57%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.78%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and LGLV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.79

The correlation between VSMV and LGLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSMV vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSMV
LGLV

Technology

38.1%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

16.1%
5.8%

Healthcare

14.1%
7.1%

Industrials

8.2%
18.4%

Financial Services

7.8%
9.9%

Communication Services

5.1%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
9.1%

Energy

4.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
17.6%

Utilities

0.0%
11.6%

Technology

VSMV
38.1%
LGLV
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

VSMV
16.1%
LGLV
5.8%

Healthcare

VSMV
14.1%
LGLV
7.1%

Industrials

VSMV
8.2%
LGLV
18.4%

Financial Services

VSMV
7.8%
LGLV
9.9%

Communication Services

VSMV
5.1%
LGLV
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VSMV
4.9%
LGLV
9.1%

Energy

VSMV
4.1%
LGLV
3.5%

Basic Materials

VSMV
1.6%
LGLV
3.5%

Real Estate

VSMV
0.0%
LGLV
17.6%

Utilities

VSMV
0.0%
LGLV
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSMVLGLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.10

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.76

+3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.31

1.80

+14.51

VSMV vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and LGLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-36.64%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-6.86%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-10.17%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-17.49%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-4.79%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-3.22%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.90%

-1.50%

Volatility

VSMV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is 3.31%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that VSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSMVLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.51%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

7.00%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.30%

9.57%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

12.94%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

16.07%

-1.05%

VSMV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSMV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than LGLV's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.09%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.37%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSMV and LGLV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGLV has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to VSMV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.19% vs 8.27% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.37% for VSMV.

VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: Crestview and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.12% for LGLV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSMV and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer