VSMV vs. LGLV
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV).
VSMV and LGLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VSMV is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2017. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. Both VSMV and LGLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VSMV or LGLV.
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and LGLV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VSMV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VSMV:
1.75
LGLV:
1.82
VSMV:
2.43
LGLV:
2.50
VSMV:
1.33
LGLV:
1.32
VSMV:
3.08
LGLV:
2.42
VSMV:
10.02
LGLV:
9.78
VSMV:
1.58%
LGLV:
1.70%
VSMV:
9.04%
LGLV:
9.12%
VSMV:
-31.33%
LGLV:
-36.64%
VSMV:
-4.65%
LGLV:
-6.85%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VSMV having a 16.03% return and LGLV slightly lower at 15.73%.
VSMV
16.03%
-1.72%
6.57%
17.35%
9.74%
N/A
LGLV
15.73%
-3.65%
8.36%
17.83%
9.80%
11.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSMV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VSMV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VSMV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than LGLV's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.34% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% | 7.14% | 2.99% |
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and LGLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VSMV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is 2.79%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that VSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.