VSMV vs. LGLV
VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) and LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - VSMV tracks the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index while LGLV tracks the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSMV returned 11.19%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for LGLV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSMV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGLV.
Performance
VSMV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 2.78% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
LGLV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
VSMV vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.57% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.78% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 30.83% | 0.32% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and LGLV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VSMV and LGLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VSMV vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSMV
LGLV
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VSMV
LGLV
Consumer Defensive
VSMV
LGLV
Healthcare
VSMV
LGLV
Industrials
VSMV
LGLV
Financial Services
VSMV
LGLV
Communication Services
VSMV
LGLV
Consumer Cyclical
VSMV
LGLV
Energy
VSMV
LGLV
Basic Materials
VSMV
LGLV
Real Estate
VSMV
LGLV
Utilities
VSMV
LGLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
LGLV
VSMV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSMV | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.10 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.76 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 1.80 | +14.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and LGLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -36.64% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -6.86% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -10.17% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -17.49% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -4.79% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -3.22% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 2.90% | -1.50% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is 3.31%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that VSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.51% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 7.00% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 9.57% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.88% | 12.94% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.07% | -1.05% |
VSMV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSMV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than LGLV's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSMV and LGLV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGLV has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to VSMV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs LGLV's -36.64%.
On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.19% vs 8.27% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.37% for VSMV.
VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: Crestview and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.12% for LGLV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSMV and LGLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer