PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOO having a 11.34% return and VO slightly lower at 10.92%. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.55%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.58% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%

VO

1D
0.79%
1M
3.19%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.35%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.92%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and VO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VOO and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
VO

Technology

35.7%
18.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
12.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.6%

Industrials

8.3%
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
8.5%

Utilities

2.4%
8.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.2%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
VO
18.6%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
VO
12.8%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
VO
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
VO
8.6%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
VO
7.6%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
VO
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
VO
4.8%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
VO
8.5%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
VO
8.3%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
VO
5.4%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
VO
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.40

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.03

9.13

+5.90

VOO vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.59

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.46

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.61

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.50

+0.38

Drawdowns

VOO vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-58.87%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.17%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-19.02%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-27.57%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-39.37%

+5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-7.86%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.14%

-0.23%

Volatility

VOO vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 2.78%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.99%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

9.24%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

12.33%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

17.60%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

18.94%

-0.94%

VOO vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOO and VO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and VO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.55% vs 11.58% for VO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO and VO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer