PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 15.56%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and VGT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.89

The correlation between VOO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
VGT

Technology

35.7%
98.5%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.5%

Communication Services

11.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
0.0%

Industrials

8.3%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.3%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.0%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
VGT
98.5%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
VGT
0.5%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
VGT

-

Energy

VOO
3.5%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
VGT

-

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
VGT
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.95

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

3.63

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.69

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.73

11.77

+2.96

VOO vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.95

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

1.05

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.68

+0.21

Drawdowns

VOO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-54.63%

+20.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.40%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-27.23%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-35.07%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-35.07%

+1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.48%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-7.95%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

5.13%

-3.22%

Volatility

VOO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 2.84%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

6.39%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

16.07%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

20.57%

-8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

25.18%

-8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

24.60%

-6.59%

VOO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and VGT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 15.56% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 15.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while VGT is Technology Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer