VOO vs. VT
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 15.77%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for VT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
VOO vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 15.77%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.20% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
VT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
VOO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.36% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and VT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VOO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
VT
Financial Services
VOO
VT
Communication Services
VOO
VT
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
VT
Healthcare
VOO
VT
Industrials
VOO
VT
Consumer Defensive
VOO
VT
Energy
VOO
VT
Utilities
VOO
VT
Real Estate
VOO
VT
Basic Materials
VOO
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
VT
VOO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.07 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.58 | 13.35 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -50.27% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.67% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -16.51% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -26.38% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -34.24% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -0.77% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -7.00% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.22% | -0.24% |
Volatility
VOO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.60%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.23% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 11.12% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 13.44% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 16.16% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.27% | +0.78% |
VOO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VOO and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 13.20% for VT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while VT is Global Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer