PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. GIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 14.98%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -2.58% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.90%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
14.77%

GIS

1D
-1.03%
1M
14.39%
6M
-12.66%
YTD
-15.22%
1Y
-20.32%
3Y*
-17.57%
5Y*
-4.99%
10Y*
-2.58%
ALL TIME*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.44%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-15.22%-23.75%1.45%-19.97%28.09%18.53%13.60%43.13%-31.57%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and GIS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.27

The correlation between VOO and GIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.88

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.59

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

-1.14

+10.77

VOO vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and GIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and GIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-59.63%

+25.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-34.48%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-53.45%

+34.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-59.63%

+35.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-59.63%

+25.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-52.03%

+50.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-10.38%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

17.80%

-15.76%

Volatility

VOO vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.36%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

12.90%

-9.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

21.53%

-11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

26.43%

-13.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.90%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

22.42%

-4.42%

Dividends

VOO vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than GIS's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
6.49%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and GIS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIS has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to VOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs GIS's -59.63%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and GIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer