VONE vs. MGV
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONE returned 15.46%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
VONE vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VONE has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 15.46%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.
VONE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
VONE vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 9.48% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 20.95% | 31.12% | -4.84% | 21.55% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and MGV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VONE and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VONE vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONE
MGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VONE
MGV
Financial Services
VONE
MGV
Communication Services
VONE
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
VONE
MGV
Industrials
VONE
MGV
Healthcare
VONE
MGV
Consumer Defensive
VONE
MGV
Energy
VONE
MGV
Utilities
VONE
MGV
Real Estate
VONE
MGV
Basic Materials
VONE
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
MGV
VONE vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 4.77 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 18.12 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONE vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -56.07% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -6.42% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -13.18% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -16.54% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | -35.41% | +0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | 0.00% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -7.78% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.69% | +0.29% |
Volatility
VONE vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.32%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.32% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 7.77% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 10.15% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 13.57% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 16.36% | +1.93% |
VONE vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONE vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MGV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONE and MGV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONE has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 13.43% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VONE.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.03% for VONE.
VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer