VONE vs. IWB
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 Index, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONE returned 15.31%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for IWB. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IWB.
Performance
VONE vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VONE having a 8.02% return and IWB slightly lower at 8.01%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONE having a 15.31% annualized return and IWB not far behind at 15.25%.
VONE
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
IWB
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
VONE vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 8.02% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 20.95% | 31.12% | -4.84% | 21.55% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 8.01% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and IWB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VONE and IWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONE vs. IWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONE
IWB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VONE
IWB
Financial Services
VONE
IWB
Communication Services
VONE
IWB
Consumer Cyclical
VONE
IWB
Industrials
VONE
IWB
Healthcare
VONE
IWB
Consumer Defensive
VONE
IWB
Energy
VONE
IWB
Utilities
VONE
IWB
Real Estate
VONE
IWB
Basic Materials
VONE
IWB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
IWB
VONE vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONE | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.60 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 11.56 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONE vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and IWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -55.38% | +20.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.86% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -19.09% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -25.20% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | -34.60% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -2.98% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -10.84% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.99% | 0.00% |
Volatility
VONE vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.84% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 9.88% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 12.57% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 17.20% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 18.15% | +0.11% |
VONE vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONE vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than IWB's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VONE and IWB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWB has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to VONE (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs IWB's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.31% vs 15.25% for IWB. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 15.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWB.
VONE has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.94% for IWB.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.15% for IWB.
VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and IWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer