PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONE vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONE vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, VONE has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.33%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


VONE

1D
0.22%
1M
5.34%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
15.33%

VONG

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.89%
YTD
8.61%
6M
7.89%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONE vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
11.34%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
8.61%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and VONG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VONE and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONE vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONE
VONG

Technology

33.9%
51.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
5.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
13.2%

Industrials

9.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.7%

Energy

3.7%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.3%

Technology

VONE
33.9%
VONG
51.4%

Financial Services

VONE
11.9%
VONG
5.3%

Communication Services

VONE
10.9%
VONG
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VONE
10.3%
VONG
13.2%

Industrials

VONE
9.2%
VONG
5.7%

Healthcare

VONE
8.7%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

VONE
4.8%
VONG
2.7%

Energy

VONE
3.7%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

VONE
2.3%
VONG
0.3%

Real Estate

VONE
2.2%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VONE
2.0%
VONG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONE vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONE vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONEVONGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

2.50

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.79

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

6.02

+9.38

VONE vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONE Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONE and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONEVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.90

-0.05

Drawdowns

VONE vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONEVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-32.72%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-16.23%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-23.27%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-32.72%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-32.72%

-1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-4.88%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.83%

-2.91%

Volatility

VONE vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) is 2.71%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that VONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONEVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

3.23%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

11.53%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

15.32%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

21.33%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

20.87%

-2.62%

VONE vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONE vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than VONG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VONE and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VONE (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.77% vs 15.33% for VONE. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 15.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VONE.

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.

VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.06% for VONG.

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONE and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer