VO vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for RODM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

VO vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 11.77%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.

VO

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 19.60%
• 3Y*: 15.74%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 11.77%

RODM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	10.43%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	12.24%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and RODM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.69

The correlation between VO and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VO	RODM
Technology	18.6%	10.8%
Industrials	17.9%	16.6%
Financial Services	12.8%	25.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	5.8%
Energy	8.5%	6.8%
Utilities	8.3%	4.9%
Healthcare	7.6%	8.9%
Real Estate	5.4%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.0%
Basic Materials	4.2%	6.4%
Communication Services	3.1%	5.5%

Return for Risk

VO vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 49
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 81
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VO	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.31	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.24	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.42	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	3.58	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	14.22	-5.79

VO vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VO vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VO	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.87%	-35.98%	-22.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-7.10%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.02%	-10.58%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	-28.85%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.37%	-35.98%	-3.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.31%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.85%	-6.37%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.78%	+0.38%

Volatility

VO vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.54%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VO	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	3.54%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	8.76%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	11.02%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.65%	13.47%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	15.21%	+3.75%

VO vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VO vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than RODM's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.77%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.36%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VO and RODM in my portfolio?

VO and RODM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VO or RODM?

VO has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, VO or RODM?

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 9.30% for RODM. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VO or RODM?

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VO or RODM?

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VO or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

What is the main difference between VO and RODM?

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.