RODM vs. SCHF
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RODM returned 9.39%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
RODM vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.39%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
RODM vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 10.94% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and SCHF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between RODM and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
RODM vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RODM
SCHF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
RODM
SCHF
Industrials
RODM
SCHF
Technology
RODM
SCHF
Healthcare
RODM
SCHF
Basic Materials
RODM
SCHF
Energy
RODM
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
RODM
SCHF
Communication Services
RODM
SCHF
Utilities
RODM
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
RODM
SCHF
Real Estate
RODM
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
SCHF
RODM vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.18 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.43 | 12.22 | +2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -34.87% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -11.48% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -13.41% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -29.14% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | -34.87% | -1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -7.36% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.98% | -1.19% |
Volatility
RODM vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.15%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 6.42% | -3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 14.43% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 16.63% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 16.55% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 17.21% | -2.02% |
RODM vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.80% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and SCHF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to RODM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 9.39% for RODM. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.80% for RODM.
RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.06% for SCHF.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer