PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.39%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.


RODM

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
10.94%
6M
11.39%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
9.39%

SCHF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.27%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.94%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
17.68%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and SCHF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.87

The correlation between RODM and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RODM vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RODM
SCHF

Financial Services

26.6%
23.3%

Industrials

16.7%
18.1%

Technology

10.5%
17.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

6.4%
7.4%

Energy

6.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
7.3%

Communication Services

5.5%
3.6%

Utilities

4.8%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
5.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
2.0%

Financial Services

RODM
26.6%
SCHF
23.3%

Industrials

RODM
16.7%
SCHF
18.1%

Technology

RODM
10.5%
SCHF
17.6%

Healthcare

RODM
9.0%
SCHF
7.0%

Basic Materials

RODM
6.4%
SCHF
7.4%

Energy

RODM
6.3%
SCHF
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
6.0%
SCHF
7.3%

Communication Services

RODM
5.5%
SCHF
3.6%

Utilities

RODM
4.8%
SCHF
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

RODM
4.0%
SCHF
5.7%

Real Estate

RODM
3.5%
SCHF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RODMSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.18

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

12.22

+2.22

RODM vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-34.87%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-11.48%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-13.41%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-29.14%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-34.87%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

0.00%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-7.36%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.98%

-1.19%

Volatility

RODM vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is 3.15%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that RODM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

6.42%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

14.43%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

16.63%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.45%

16.55%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

17.21%

-2.02%

RODM vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

RODM vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.80%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.90%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and SCHF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to RODM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 9.39% for RODM. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.80% for RODM.

RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.06% for SCHF.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer