RODM vs. GLOF
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF).
RODM and GLOF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RODM is a passively managed fund by The Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2015. GLOF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. Both RODM and GLOF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RODM or GLOF.
Key characteristics
| RODM | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.61% | 18.70% |
| 1Y Return | 16.89% | 26.80% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.47% | 7.02% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.01% | 10.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.51 | 2.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.19 | 3.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.44 | 3.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.08 | 14.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.81% | 1.89% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.83% | 11.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.98% | -34.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.39% | -1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and GLOF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RODM vs. GLOF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLOF's 18.70% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RODM vs. GLOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GLOF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RODM vs. GLOF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RODM vs. GLOF - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than GLOF's 2.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 3.88% | 4.43% | 3.81% | 4.40% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 2.27% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 1.90% | 1.73% | 2.41% | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.94% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
RODM vs. GLOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than GLOF's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and GLOF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RODM vs. GLOF - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) at 2.95%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.