VO vs. PKB
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for PKB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.
Performance
VO vs. PKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed PKB with an annualized return of 11.77%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
VO vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and PKB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VO and PKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
VO vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
PKB
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Technology
VO
PKB
-
Industrials
VO
PKB
Financial Services
VO
PKB
Consumer Cyclical
VO
PKB
Energy
VO
PKB
Utilities
VO
PKB
Healthcare
VO
PKB
-
Real Estate
VO
PKB
-
Consumer Defensive
VO
PKB
-
Basic Materials
VO
PKB
Communication Services
VO
PKB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank
VO
PKB
VO vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.27 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 7.21 | +1.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and PKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -65.21% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -15.41% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -29.75% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -34.85% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -52.29% | +12.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -4.31% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -15.75% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 4.86% | -2.70% |
Volatility
VO vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 8.73% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 18.69% | -8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 23.78% | -11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 25.78% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 27.29% | -8.33% |
VO vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VO vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than PKB's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and PKB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs PKB's -65.21%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PKB is Building & Construction. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.60% for PKB.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and PKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer