PKB vs. QQQ
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 16.35%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
PKB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PKB having a 20.35% return and QQQ slightly higher at 20.41%. Over the past 10 years, PKB has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.35%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
PKB
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 18.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
PKB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 20.35% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and QQQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PKB and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKB vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
QQQ
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
QQQ
Basic Materials
PKB
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
QQQ
Utilities
PKB
QQQ
Energy
PKB
QQQ
Financial Services
PKB
QQQ
Communication Services
PKB
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
QQQ
Healthcare
PKB
-
QQQ
Real Estate
PKB
-
QQQ
Technology
PKB
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
QQQ
PKB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.44 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 12.79 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -82.97% | +17.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -11.96% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -22.77% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -35.12% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | -35.12% | -17.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.99% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -32.73% | +16.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 3.21% | +1.65% |
Volatility
PKB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 7.94%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 8.47% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 14.20% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 17.67% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 22.64% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 22.43% | +4.89% |
PKB vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.23% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and QQQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to PKB (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 16.35% for PKB. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 7.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.23% for PKB.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer