PKB vs. ITB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - PKB tracks the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index while ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 14.48%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for ITB. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.

Performance

PKB vs. ITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed ITB with an annualized return of 14.48%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.

PKB

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -6.80%
• 6M: 2.12%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: 14.48%
• ALL TIME*: 10.05%

ITB

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -8.32%
• 6M: -7.21%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 1Y: -5.06%
• 3Y*: 2.79%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 13.43%
• ALL TIME*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	$179.18M	$195.32M	$218.82M
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	$846.36K	$1.43M	$1.62M

PKB vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	8.46%	22.47%	20.24%	55.29%	-24.88%	32.96%	24.49%	40.15%	-31.11%	24.67%
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	-1.69%	-5.26%	2.06%	68.91%	-26.26%	49.25%	26.42%	48.70%	-30.92%	59.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and ITB is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006	0.82

The correlation between PKB and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKB vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PKB	ITB
Industrials	43.6%	16.0%
Basic Materials	35.8%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	20.7%	74.6%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Energy	2.5%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

PKB vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PKB

PKB Risk / Return Rank: 31
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ITB

ITB Risk / Return Rank: 10
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PKB vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PKB	ITB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	-0.09	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	0.09	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.01	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	-0.10	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.15	-0.17	+3.33

PKB vs. ITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the ITB Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and ITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PKB vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and ITB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKB	ITB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.21%	-86.53%	+21.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.41%	-26.04%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	-33.35%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-40.55%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-52.10%	-0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.00%	-25.47%	+13.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.70%	-36.98%	+21.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	14.54%	-8.89%

Volatility

PKB vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 7.31%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKB	ITB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	8.79%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.52%	22.03%	-2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.85%	29.51%	-4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.91%	29.57%	-3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.37%	30.20%	-2.83%

PKB vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

PKB vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ITB's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	0.68%	1.67%	0.46%	0.48%	0.86%	0.37%	0.46%	0.50%	0.63%	0.28%	0.43%	0.34%
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.23%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.30%	0.37%	0.54%	0.17%	0.31%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PKB and ITB in my portfolio?

PKB and ITB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PKB or ITB?

ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to PKB (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs ITB's -86.53%.

Which ETF is better, PKB or ITB?

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 14.48% vs 13.43% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PKB or ITB?

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PKB or ITB?

ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PKB or ITB?

ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.19% for PKB.

What is the main difference between PKB and ITB?

PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.38% for ITB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.