PKB vs. ITB
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - PKB tracks the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index while ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 14.71%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for ITB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
PKB vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed ITB with an annualized return of 14.71%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively lower 13.57% annualized return.
PKB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
ITB
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
PKB vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 12.44% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.88% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and ITB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PKB and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKB vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
ITB
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Industrials
PKB
ITB
Basic Materials
PKB
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
ITB
Utilities
PKB
ITB
-
Energy
PKB
ITB
-
Financial Services
PKB
ITB
-
Communication Services
PKB
-
ITB
-
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
PKB
-
ITB
-
Real Estate
PKB
-
ITB
Technology
PKB
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
ITB
PKB vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.07 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | -0.13 | +5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -86.53% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -26.04% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -33.35% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -40.55% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | -52.10% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.77% | -22.77% | +14.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -37.02% | +21.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 13.97% | -8.95% |
Volatility
PKB vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 9.48%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 11.13% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.30% | 22.59% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 30.21% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 29.51% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 30.13% | -2.82% |
PKB vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ITB's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and ITB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to PKB (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 14.71% vs 13.57% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.19% for PKB.
PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.38% for ITB.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer