PKB vs. ITB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB).
PKB and ITB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PKB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2005. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. Both PKB and ITB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PKB or ITB.
Performance
PKB vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 34.91% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 16.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 14.79%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 16.98% annualized return.
PKB
34.91%
7.03%
21.38%
54.51%
20.84%
14.79%
ITB
16.80%
-1.86%
14.51%
37.60%
22.29%
16.98%
Key characteristics
| PKB | ITB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.35 | 1.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.05 | 2.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.79 | 2.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.76 | 6.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.71% | 6.19% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.56% | 25.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.21% | -86.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.60% | -8.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PKB vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and ITB is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PKB vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PKB vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ITB's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
PKB vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and ITB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PKB vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) at 6.21%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.