PKB vs. AIQ
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PKB returned 18.38%/yr vs 17.67%/yr for AIQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
PKB vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 31.91% return.
PKB
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 18.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
AIQ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 31.91%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 61.99%
- 3Y*
- 34.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PKB vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 20.35% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -20.89% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 31.91% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and AIQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PKB and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKB vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
AIQ
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
AIQ
Basic Materials
PKB
AIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
AIQ
Utilities
PKB
AIQ
-
Energy
PKB
AIQ
-
Financial Services
PKB
AIQ
Communication Services
PKB
-
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
AIQ
-
Healthcare
PKB
-
AIQ
Real Estate
PKB
-
AIQ
-
Technology
PKB
-
AIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
AIQ
PKB vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.78 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 12.25 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -44.66% | -20.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -16.47% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -26.35% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -44.66% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.35% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -9.78% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 5.08% | -0.22% |
Volatility
PKB vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 7.94%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 13.84% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 21.92% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 25.95% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 25.89% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 25.77% | +1.55% |
PKB vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.23% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and AIQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to PKB (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, PKB leads with 18.38% vs 17.67% for AIQ. On fees, PKB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 7.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PKB has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 17.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PKB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while AIQ is Technology Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer