VO vs. IWR
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR).
VO and IWR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. IWR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. Both VO and IWR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VO or IWR.
Correlation
The correlation between VO and IWR is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VO vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VO:
1.34
IWR:
1.21
VO:
1.86
IWR:
1.70
VO:
1.24
IWR:
1.21
VO:
1.63
IWR:
1.90
VO:
7.86
IWR:
6.78
VO:
2.15%
IWR:
2.40%
VO:
12.61%
IWR:
13.42%
VO:
-58.89%
IWR:
-58.79%
VO:
-7.15%
IWR:
-7.51%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VO having a 15.33% return and IWR slightly lower at 14.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 9.58% annualized return and IWR not far behind at 9.46%.
VO
15.33%
-3.45%
9.49%
15.89%
9.97%
9.58%
IWR
14.74%
-3.53%
9.15%
15.05%
9.74%
9.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VO vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VO vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VO vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than IWR's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.88% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% | 1.18% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.66% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% | 1.45% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
VO vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and IWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VO vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.43%, while iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.