PortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. SCHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and SCHM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IWR vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWR:

0.37

SCHM:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

IWR:

0.66

SCHM:

0.37

Omega Ratio

IWR:

1.09

SCHM:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

IWR:

0.34

SCHM:

0.14

Martin Ratio

IWR:

1.18

SCHM:

0.45

Ulcer Index

IWR:

6.13%

SCHM:

7.22%

Daily Std Dev

IWR:

19.81%

SCHM:

21.68%

Max Drawdown

IWR:

-58.79%

SCHM:

-42.43%

Current Drawdown

IWR:

-7.13%

SCHM:

-9.85%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, IWR has underperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 8.89%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.


IWR

YTD

0.00%

1M

12.15%

6M

-3.89%

1Y

7.29%

3Y*

10.39%

5Y*

13.25%

10Y*

8.89%

SCHM

YTD

-2.53%

1M

12.54%

6M

-5.97%

1Y

3.46%

3Y*

9.75%

5Y*

13.31%

10Y*

9.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Russell Midcap ETF

Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF

IWR vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWR vs. SCHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWR is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWR is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWR is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWR is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWR is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWR is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHM is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHM is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHM is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHM is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHM is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHM is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWR vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and SCHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IWR vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SCHM's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.33%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.05%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%1.45%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.44%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%1.48%

Drawdowns

IWR vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and SCHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IWR vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 5.11%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...