PortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. VXF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and VXF is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IWR vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWR:

0.52

VXF:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

IWR:

0.96

VXF:

0.76

Omega Ratio

IWR:

1.13

VXF:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IWR:

0.55

VXF:

0.38

Martin Ratio

IWR:

1.89

VXF:

1.17

Ulcer Index

IWR:

6.17%

VXF:

8.75%

Daily Std Dev

IWR:

19.80%

VXF:

24.67%

Max Drawdown

IWR:

-58.79%

VXF:

-58.04%

Current Drawdown

IWR:

-6.21%

VXF:

-10.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than VXF's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IWR has outperformed VXF with an annualized return of 9.13%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.


IWR

YTD

0.98%

1M

3.58%

6M

-5.80%

1Y

10.12%

3Y*

8.90%

5Y*

11.53%

10Y*

9.13%

VXF

YTD

-3.04%

1M

4.43%

6M

-9.84%

1Y

9.57%

3Y*

9.37%

5Y*

10.35%

10Y*

8.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Russell Midcap ETF

Vanguard Extended Market ETF

IWR vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWR vs. VXF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWR is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWR is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWR is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWR is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWR is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWR is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VXF is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VXF is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VXF is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VXF is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VXF is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VXF is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWR vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and VXF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IWR vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than VXF's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.31%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.05%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%1.45%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.21%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%1.32%

Drawdowns

IWR vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, roughly equal to the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and VXF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IWR vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 5.18%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...