IWR vs. IWN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN).
IWR and IWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both IWR and IWN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWR or IWN.
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and IWN is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWR vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWR:
1.40
IWN:
0.46
IWR:
1.96
IWN:
0.80
IWR:
1.24
IWN:
1.10
IWR:
2.18
IWN:
0.71
IWR:
7.55
IWN:
2.27
IWR:
2.47%
IWN:
4.25%
IWR:
13.35%
IWN:
20.86%
IWR:
-58.79%
IWN:
-61.55%
IWR:
-6.27%
IWN:
-9.06%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than IWN's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IWR has outperformed IWN with an annualized return of 9.50%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.
IWR
16.28%
-3.00%
10.64%
17.10%
10.02%
9.50%
IWN
7.59%
-4.60%
10.63%
7.88%
7.06%
6.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWR vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWR vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWR vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than IWN's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% | 1.45% | 1.31% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.88% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
IWR vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and IWN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWR vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 4.92%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.