VO vs. IMCG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.58%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for IMCG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCG.

Performance

VO vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 20.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 11.58%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.

VO

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 10.35%
• 1Y: 19.49%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

IMCG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 7.37%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 6M: 18.66%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	10.92%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	20.64%	6.55%	18.14%	20.73%	-25.79%	15.39%	45.64%	35.70%	-3.68%	25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and IMCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004	0.93

The correlation between VO and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VO	IMCG
Technology	18.6%	30.4%
Industrials	17.9%	26.6%
Financial Services	12.8%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	10.0%
Energy	8.5%	2.1%
Utilities	8.3%	2.7%
Healthcare	7.6%	7.4%
Real Estate	5.4%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	1.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.5%
Communication Services	3.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

VO vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 48
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 47
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VO	IMCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.55	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.23	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.36	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	9.19	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VO vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VO	IMCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.55	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.43	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.71	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.54	-0.04

Drawdowns

VO vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and IMCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VO	IMCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.87%	-58.96%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-10.17%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.02%	-21.92%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	-35.08%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.37%	-35.08%	-4.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-9.22%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.61%	-0.47%

Volatility

VO vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 2.99%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VO	IMCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	4.53%	-1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	12.54%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	15.50%	-3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	20.16%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	20.51%	-1.57%

VO vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VO vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than IMCG's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.65%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.35%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VO and IMCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, VO and IMCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VO or IMCG?

IMCG has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

Which ETF is better, VO or IMCG?

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.46% vs 11.58% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VO or IMCG?

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VO or IMCG?

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VO or IMCG?

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.65% for IMCG.

What is the main difference between VO and IMCG?

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IMCG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.06% for IMCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.