PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMCG vs. VOT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IMCG vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.65%
14.95%
IMCG
VOT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 21.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 12.26%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.


IMCG

YTD

23.11%

1M

6.52%

6M

15.64%

1Y

34.18%

5Y (annualized)

13.88%

10Y (annualized)

12.26%

VOT

YTD

21.39%

1M

6.63%

6M

14.95%

1Y

32.26%

5Y (annualized)

12.26%

10Y (annualized)

10.82%

Key characteristics


IMCGVOT
Sharpe Ratio2.442.24
Sortino Ratio3.333.01
Omega Ratio1.411.39
Calmar Ratio1.641.43
Martin Ratio12.7013.02
Ulcer Index2.73%2.52%
Daily Std Dev14.20%14.65%
Max Drawdown-58.96%-60.17%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMCG vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for VOT: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%
Expense ratio chart for IMCG: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between IMCG and VOT is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMCG vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.442.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.333.01
The chart of Omega ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.411.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.641.43
The chart of Martin ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 12.70, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.7013.02
IMCG
VOT

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and VOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.44
2.24
IMCG
VOT

Dividends

IMCG vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than VOT's 0.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.76%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%0.60%0.36%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%0.79%0.61%

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
IMCG
VOT

Volatility

IMCG vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.59%
4.83%
IMCG
VOT