PortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. IMCB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and IMCB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IMCG vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMCG:

0.46

IMCB:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

IMCG:

0.81

IMCB:

0.71

Omega Ratio

IMCG:

1.11

IMCB:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IMCG:

0.45

IMCB:

0.39

Martin Ratio

IMCG:

1.58

IMCB:

1.36

Ulcer Index

IMCG:

6.30%

IMCB:

5.62%

Daily Std Dev

IMCG:

20.79%

IMCB:

18.45%

Max Drawdown

IMCG:

-58.96%

IMCB:

-58.80%

Current Drawdown

IMCG:

-8.38%

IMCB:

-7.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed IMCB with an annualized return of 11.03%, while IMCB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.


IMCG

YTD

-1.41%

1M

11.04%

6M

-4.16%

1Y

9.26%

5Y*

11.41%

10Y*

11.03%

IMCB

YTD

-1.10%

1M

9.53%

6M

-5.09%

1Y

6.77%

5Y*

13.55%

10Y*

8.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMCG vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMCG vs. IMCB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMCG is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMCG is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMCG is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMCG is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMCG is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMCG is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMCB is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMCB is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMCB is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMCB is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMCB is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMCB is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMCG vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and IMCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IMCG vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than IMCB's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%0.60%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.48%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%1.40%

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and IMCB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IMCG vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 6.18%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...