Correlation
The correlation between IMCG and XMHQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
IMCG vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
IMCG and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both IMCG and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMCG or XMHQ.
Performance
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
IMCG:
0.74
XMHQ:
-0.11
IMCG:
1.05
XMHQ:
-0.05
IMCG:
1.14
XMHQ:
0.99
IMCG:
0.63
XMHQ:
-0.14
IMCG:
2.17
XMHQ:
-0.38
IMCG:
6.32%
XMHQ:
8.92%
IMCG:
21.08%
XMHQ:
22.95%
IMCG:
-58.96%
XMHQ:
-58.19%
IMCG:
-4.82%
XMHQ:
-10.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's -0.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCG having a 11.36% annualized return and XMHQ not far behind at 10.94%.
IMCG
2.42%
7.00%
-3.63%
15.29%
11.84%
11.05%
11.36%
XMHQ
-0.99%
5.12%
-9.67%
-3.51%
14.11%
15.79%
10.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMCG vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IMCG
XMHQ
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than XMHQ's 5.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.75% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 5.24% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and XMHQ.
Loading data...
Volatility
IMCG vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 5.19%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...