VLUE vs. MGV
VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index while MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLUE returned 14.70%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
VLUE vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 43.96% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 14.70%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.73% annualized return.
VLUE
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 37.01%
- YTD
- 43.96%
- 1Y
- 73.16%
- 3Y*
- 30.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
MGV
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
VLUE vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 43.96% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.50% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and MGV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VLUE and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLUE vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLUE
MGV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VLUE
MGV
Financial Services
VLUE
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
VLUE
MGV
Communication Services
VLUE
MGV
Industrials
VLUE
MGV
Healthcare
VLUE
MGV
Consumer Defensive
VLUE
MGV
Energy
VLUE
MGV
Utilities
VLUE
MGV
Real Estate
VLUE
MGV
Basic Materials
VLUE
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
MGV
VLUE vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLUE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.14 | 4.03 | +4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.87 | 15.43 | +15.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -56.07% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -6.42% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -13.18% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | -16.54% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -35.41% | -4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -0.89% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -7.75% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.68% | +0.70% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.94%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 2.94% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 7.78% | +9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 10.20% | +9.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 13.57% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 16.29% | +3.68% |
VLUE vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLUE vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than MGV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and MGV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to MGV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 14.70% vs 12.73% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.
VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.05% for MGV.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer