VLUE vs. AVLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VLUE is passively managed, while AVLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VLUE returned 32.50%/yr vs 22.67%/yr for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

VLUE vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 45.30% return, which is significantly higher than AVLV's 20.57% return.

VLUE

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 45.30%
• 6M: 44.72%
• 1Y: 81.73%
• 3Y*: 32.50%
• 5Y*: 16.52%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

AVLV

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 37.53%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	45.30%	32.67%	7.25%	14.26%	-14.17%	9.29%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	20.57%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-5.53%	6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and AVLV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021	0.92

The correlation between VLUE and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLUE vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLUE	AVLV
Technology	40.7%	17.2%
Financial Services	10.5%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	14.1%
Communication Services	9.5%	6.9%
Industrials	8.0%	15.4%
Healthcare	7.9%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	7.7%
Energy	3.5%	14.4%
Utilities	2.0%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.3%	2.0%

Return for Risk

VLUE vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE

VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 96
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VLUE	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.31	2.99	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.37	4.11	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.53	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.09	5.90	+3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.03	23.36	+14.67

VLUE vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and AVLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLUE	AVLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.47%	-19.50%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-6.39%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-19.50%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.46%	-1.30%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-3.89%	-2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.61%	+0.55%

Volatility

VLUE vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.99%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLUE	AVLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	3.99%	+5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.13%	9.41%	+6.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.07%	12.60%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.12%	17.33%	+0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.95%	17.33%	+2.62%

VLUE vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VLUE and AVLV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLUE vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than AVLV's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.38%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	1.42%	2.11%	2.73%	2.66%	3.18%	2.22%	2.42%	2.61%	2.70%	2.14%	2.07%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLUE and AVLV in my portfolio?

VLUE and AVLV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLUE or AVLV?

VLUE has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to AVLV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

Which ETF is better, VLUE or AVLV?

On 3-year performance, VLUE leads with 32.50% vs 22.67% for AVLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLUE or AVLV?

Over the 3-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 32.50% return vs 22.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLUE or AVLV?

VLUE and AVLV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLUE or AVLV?

VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.38% for AVLV.

What is the main difference between VLUE and AVLV?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.