PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLUE vs. VLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLUE vs. VLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 50.50% return, which is significantly higher than VLU's 13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed VLU with an annualized return of 15.97%, while VLU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.21% annualized return.


VLUE

1D
2.13%
1M
9.37%
YTD
50.50%
6M
49.56%
1Y
89.78%
3Y*
34.06%
5Y*
17.54%
10Y*
15.97%

VLU

1D
0.07%
1M
0.71%
YTD
13.20%
6M
12.60%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. VLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
50.50%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
13.20%16.70%17.24%17.18%-8.24%30.95%9.91%26.20%-7.89%18.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and VLU is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.76

The correlation between VLUE and VLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VLUE vs. VLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLUE
VLU

Technology

40.7%
19.1%

Financial Services

10.5%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.7%

Communication Services

9.5%
8.8%

Industrials

8.0%
8.3%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.1%

Energy

3.5%
6.6%

Utilities

2.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.3%
2.6%

Technology

VLUE
40.7%
VLU
19.1%

Financial Services

VLUE
10.5%
VLU
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VLUE
10.1%
VLU
10.7%

Communication Services

VLUE
9.5%
VLU
8.8%

Industrials

VLUE
8.0%
VLU
8.3%

Healthcare

VLUE
7.9%
VLU
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VLUE
4.4%
VLU
7.1%

Energy

VLUE
3.5%
VLU
6.6%

Utilities

VLUE
2.0%
VLU
3.5%

Real Estate

VLUE
1.8%
VLU
3.4%

Basic Materials

VLUE
1.3%
VLU
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLUE vs. VLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. VLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLUEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.48

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

4.56

+5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.99

18.19

+23.81

VLUE vs. VLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 4.83, which is higher than the VLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and VLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. VLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than VLU's maximum drawdown of -37.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and VLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.47%

-37.39%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-6.34%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-16.22%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-19.55%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

-37.39%

-2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.25%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-3.73%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.59%

+0.56%

Volatility

VLUE vs. VLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) at 2.94%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

2.94%

+5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

7.90%

+7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

11.00%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

15.39%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

18.06%

+1.90%

VLUE vs. VLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VLU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLUE vs. VLU - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VLU's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
2.05%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.37%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLUE and VLU have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to VLU (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs VLU's -37.39%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.97% vs 14.21% for VLU. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 14.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.

VLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.37% for VLUE.

VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while VLU tracks S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.12% for VLU.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLUE and VLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer